Visualizing OpenStreetMap history – part 2
Thanks to the hard work of Vincent we now have a database with the average version and average age of nodes per grid cell. Now we can start to get a feeling of the data. I’ve rendered both datasets for Amsterdam on a 10x10m grid. In general the idea is that red is bad and green is good. The younger a node is, the more likely it reflects the current situation in the real world. Also the higher the version number, the more people have been looking at that node and corrected it.
At least that is the theory Martijn tries to work with.
The age in days for OpenStreetMap nodes
Visualizing OpenStreetMap history
I’m working with Martijn and Vincent on a way to visualize the history of OpenStreetmap data for their analysis of the ‘crowd-quality’ of the data. I used my favorite visualization tool Processing to visualize the history of one node:
Visualizing gps tracks with Processing
At work we got an i-gotU (a GPS logger) as a Christmas present. To show what one can do with it I decided to ask a few people to use their i-gotU to record their travels for two weeks. This resulted in over 42000 locations done by 8 different persons. Each person got his/her own color in the visualization to be able to see when people were near one another. Since the office is in Amsterdam and most people live in (different parts of) Amsterdam you can quickly see the contours of Amsterdam’s city-plan appear. Also interestingly is to note that people have their own specific areas where they spend most of their time.
WFS 1.1.0, GML 3.1.1 and OpenLayers
In the INSPIRE framework we are working on the ESDIN project and are using the EuroGeoNames (EGN) project as an implementation of ESDIN. INSPIRE is a big thing within the GIS world in Europe and loads of documents have been written so far.
We’re involved in both ESDIN and EGN and we decided to use the latter as a trial for the first. Together with our partners we’ve setup a series of servers to fulfill the needs of the projects. The main standard used is the latest WFS and GML versions, which have the annoying disadvantage that there are few clients available.
Microsoft Surface
Today the Microsoft Surface arrived, finally. They arrived in big boxes suggesting big tables, but alas they are actually pretty small. Microsoft envisages them as lounge table, as such they are very low, too low to sit comfortably on a normal chair. Being used to the Circle12 DiamondTouch, the Surface is both small and heavy. Weighing about 80kg it is difficult to move it and the actual display area is about half the size of the DiamondTouch.
We were supposed to have two normal and one developer edition but it wasn’t very clear which one was which so we picked one and carried it to our office. This turned out to quite tricky, this thing is heavy and doesn’t have any clear handles. In the end we carried it by holding the projection-surface …
Once setup we had to fiddle a bit to get the powercable connected and find the proper (two) powerswitches. Once it booted it prompted us an EULA we had to accept. However the Surface is designed to be a standalone machine completely controlled by touch but before the touch was working we had to accept the EULA, which was only accessible by touch … hm
You need to accept to start touch, and you need touch to accept